Fractional C02 Devices

Fractional Co2 Laser Device Overview

Sunday, November 15th, 2009

We put together a couple very useful charts that compare the various laser devices. The charts go over things like energy settings, spot size, laser type, manufacturer, and much more. These comparison charts are for those patients that are serious about analyzing the different lasers out there so they are equipped to make an informed decision. Many patients fall victim to their physicians selling them the latest and greatest laser procedure without doing the proper research before hands.

Comments (0)

Active FX vs. Fraxel Re:pair Article

Saturday, October 10th, 2009

To understand the differences, one must understand the similarities. The Active Fx and Fraxel Re:pair are both lasers using CO2 technologies. (Active Fx is made by Lumenis which is based in Santa Clara and Fraxel is made by Reliant in Mountain View which got acquired by Thermage.)

Comments (0)

This is an article written by Dr. Emily Tierney for FractionalC02.com and may not be republished without the written consent of FractionalC02.com or Dr. Tierney.  Dr. Tierney has no financial incentive to write this article from FractionalC02.com, the laser companies, or Boston University.  This article is intended to provide the readers of Fractional Co2.com with the knowledge and understanding to make an informed decision.

This article covers the efficacy of Fractional co2 lasers vs non ablative more traditional laser resurfacing options.  It also includes a comparison of traditional ablative Co2 laser resurfacing and the new fractional co2 laser resurfacing options.  Dr. Tierney also covers her clinical studies on the efficacy of the SmartXide Dot Fractional Co2 Device.  She has extensive experience working with various laser modalities including many fractional co2 lasers.

Fraxel Re:pair vs. SmartXide Dot

Thursday, September 10th, 2009

This is a common question asked by our readers.  We have decided to ask an expert in laser technology to address this question for our readers.

Comments (0)

Laser Resurfacing Devices

Sunday, August 2nd, 2009

Here is a partial list of the current fractional co2 laser devices that physicians in the US are using.

Comments (0)

SmartXide Dot CO2 vs. Fraxel Laser

Saturday, May 9th, 2009

The Fraxel laser and the new fractional co2 laser devices have a lot in common but they actually treat different problems. Fraxel traditionally has been used to treat acne scars, pigmentation, large pores and much more. With the popularity of the Fractional Co2 Laser many offices who own the fraxel laser are looking for ways to use both devices. This is proving to be a problem because there is a lot of overlap with the two devices.

We have spoke with numerous physicians who have experience with both devices, here is what they suggest.

Port Wine Stains- Fraxel Laser has proven to be a better option for this.

Moderate Acne Scarring- Fraxel may also be a better option because of spot size and the focalized treatment. You have to be careful not to damage the dermis to much which will cause the patient more pain than they may be willing to deal with. You will have to determine how many treatments will be needed prior to deciding which option is best for your patient.

The pain level associated with SmartXide is actually less than Fraxel in most cases so it is important that you do not go to aggressive with the Fraxel vs. doing the Fractional Co2 Laser.

The disposables with Fraxel is also something to consider but remember that most Fractional Co2 Laser Devices also have disposables despite what the manufacturer or sales person tells you.

Pore Size- SmartXide and Fraxel are both

SmartXide Dot Therapy Results

Saturday, April 25th, 2009

SmartXide Dot Therapy

There are many users of the smartxide dot fractional CO2 laser resurfacing device and many doctors love the device. Doctors want the best results for their patients and they are unwilling to buy something before they have the opportunity to test it. The Fraxel Re:pair is a great example. Fraxel has been unwilling to allow most physicians with an opportunity to try before you buy and with their price tag a lot of physicians are looking at other options. The smartxide is a great laser but in no way is the only great laser out there. Other companies offering similar equipment for a similar price are:SmartXide Dot Laser Device

Ellipse Juvia-Fractional CO2 Laser

Cresent Laser- Matrix Fractional CO2 Laser

Active FX and Deep FX- Fractional CO2 Laser

Here is a great result from a patient who had Fractional CO2 with Smartxide Dot Laser Resurfacing.

Advances in Fractional Laser Technology

Monday, January 5th, 2009

The following white paper and results of a preliminary clinical study was presented by Dr Daniel A Cassuto at the introduction of Lasering MiXto SX Fractional CO-2 Laser in 2007.

Background

CO2 laser resurfacing is a powerful tool for the treatment of several skin conditions such as fine and coarse wrinkles, scars of various origin, uneven pigmentation, dilated pores et al. Some major drawbacks have progressively limited its use: the need for effective anaesthesia, the downtime, the risk of dyspigmentation and scarring, the need for intensive postoperative care, the long-lasting erythema and the long avoidance of sun exposure

Fractional photothermolysis was introduced by Huzaira and colleagues in 2003. It was developed to overcome the above-mentioned drawbacks in the treatment of photo damaged skin. Fractional Laser Resurfacing with the midinfrared lasers uses an invisible laser beam which is strongly absorbed by water, in order to reverse the effects of skin aging and scarring. Near infrared wavelengths (Fraxel, Reliant, 1550nm; Lux 1540, Palomar) cause significant pain and require some form of anesthesia. This is a time consuming and costly aspect. Another disadvantage for the operator is that most of these devices are only capable of performing this kind of treatment. The use of ablative lasers in a fractional mode was introduced in 2006. The lesser depth of immediate tissue necrosis, in comparison to the mid infrared wavelengths, together with the possibility of further heat deposition in the dermis, significantly reduces the pain caused by the procedure, without decreasing its efficacy. A new CO2 laser (Active FX, Lumenis, 10600nm) with less penetration was shown to be more tolerable, but the 1.3 mm spot still makes some local anaesthesia and\or cooling necessary.

Juvia Article By Dermatologist Dr. Katz

Friday, January 2nd, 2009

December 9, 2008 – Long-lasting cosmetic results in the span of a long weekend: That’s the promise of Pixel CO2 OMNIFIT skin rejuvenation treatment. Leading New York cosmetic center, Juva Skin and Laser Center, is now offering patients the benefit of the Pixel device, used for the treatment of acne scarring, sun damage and for laser wrinkle removal.

Patients who have experienced Pixel CO2 report considerable improvement in scarring, sun damage, acne scars and other skin conditions. Because the laser produces little redness and irritation, patients spend significantly less time in recovery, explains Bruce E. Katz, M.D., director of Juva Skin and Laser Center.

“This device shortens our patients’ downtime ten-fold,” says Juva Skin director Dr. Bruce Katz. “The 30-day recuperation period they might have anticipated with traditional ablative laser treatment is whittled down to just three. This is something a patient can do on a long weekend without anyone knowing they had the procedure.”

The New Ellipse Juvia Fractional C02 is turning some heads in the Fractional World. Patients are looking for the best solution to their skin care needs and Juvia is answering the call. With the new ellipse juvia many patients are able to see incredible results without the downtime associated with the traditional or other fractional C02 devices. Typical cost for a treatment varies by geographical area but will range from 1500-3000 dollars with one to two treatments required. There are many dermatologists that can do this procedure but it is important that they have the experience necessary to give you the results you are looking for. We always recommend that you review before and after photos and make sure that they are the one who actually did the procedure. We also recommend checking out Cosmetic Dermatologist Directory at Http://CosmeticDermatology.net. You can find a dermatologist in your area that does the procedure that you are looking for. You can also review before and after photos.